McClaine v. Rankin
Citations
- 197 U.S. 154
- 25 S. Ct. 410
- 49 L. Ed. 702
- 1905 U.S. LEXIS 1215
Syllabus
<p>In the absence of any provision of the act of Congress creating the liability of .stockholders of national banks, fixing a limitation of time for commencing actions to enforce it, the statute of limitations of the particular State is applicable.</p> <p>Although a statutory liability may be contractual, or gtiosi-contractual in its nature, an action given by statute is not necessarily to be regarded as brought on simple contract, or breach of simple contract.</p> <p>The liability of stockholders of national banks- is conditional, and the right to sue does not obtain until the Comptroller of the Currency has acted; his order is the basis of the suit, and the statute of limitations does not commence to run until assessment made, and then it runs as against an action to enforce the statutory liability and not an action for breach of contract.</p> <p>As the statute of limitations of Washington has been construed by the courts of that State the time within which such an action must be brought • is two years under § 4805, Ballinger’s Code, arid not within three years under subd. 3 of § 4800.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is conceded that, in the absence of any provision of the act of Congress creating the 24 liability, fixing a limitation of time for commencing actions to enforce it, the statute of limitations of the particular State is applicable.”
- insolvency of a national bank
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuller, White, Beown, McKenna, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 4,134×
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 3,153×
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court· 1942-03-30· cited 1,648×
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 980×
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 701×
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenNinth Circuit· 1959-05-28· cited 349×
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1947-06-02· cited 300×
- Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 274×
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court· 1915-02-23· cited 271×
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court· 1914-04-13· cited 267×
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 213×
- Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court· 1944-01-31· cited 203×
- McAllister v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 197×
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationSecond Circuit· 1961-03-10· cited 193×
- Rawlings v. RaySupreme Court· 1941-02-03· cited 175×
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 171×
- Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 114×
- Christopher v. NorvellSupreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 83×
- Forrest v. JackSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 82×
- Curtis v. ConnlySupreme Court· 1921-12-12· cited 76×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court· 1887-03-28· cited 306×
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1869-12-13· cited 297×
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court· 1895-01-07· cited 273×
- Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1889-10-21· cited 173×
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court· 1900-02-26· cited 132×
- Flash v. ConnSupreme Court· 1883-11-26· cited 128×
- Matteson v. DentSupreme Court· 1900-02-26· cited 116×
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court· 1899-05-15· cited 105×
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1902-02-03· cited 84×
- Carrol v. GreenSupreme Court· 1876-05-18· cited 59×
- Platt v. WilmotSupreme Court· 1904-04-04· cited 54×
- Studebaker v. PerrySupreme Court· 1902-02-24· cited 53×
- Schrader v. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1890-01-20· cited 52×
Other cases named McClaine v. Rankin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.