Skip to main content

McKinney v. State

Citations

  • 553 N.E.2d 860
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 502
  • 1990 WL 57584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Indiana has jurisdiction if either the conduct that is an element of the offense or the result that is an element occurs in Indiana
  • observing that “the State must prove territorial jurisdiction beyond a reasonable doubt” to the trier of fact
  • “Jurisdiction may not be waived or conferred by consent.”
  • discussing territorial jurisdiction and venue
  • no discussion of double jeopardy
  • no discussion of double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Hoffman, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.