Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 897 N.E.2d 927
  • 2008 Ind. LEXIS 1277
  • 2008 WL 5233396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s ongoing molestation of the victim, coupled with his abuse of a position of trust, was sufficient to justify the imposition of enhanced sentences
  • revising consecutive child molesting sentences to run concurrently where there was only one victim
  • noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense
  • revising two consecutive enhanced sentences to concurrent sentences where the two counts of child molestation were identical and involved the same child and citing Walker
  • noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense
  • noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.