Indiana Supreme Court· 12/11/2008
Harris v. State
Citations
- 897 N.E.2d 927
- 2008 Ind. LEXIS 1277
- 2008 WL 5233396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant’s ongoing molestation of the victim, coupled with his abuse of a position of trust, was sufficient to justify the imposition of enhanced sentences
- revising consecutive child molesting sentences to run concurrently where there was only one victim
- noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense
- revising two consecutive enhanced sentences to concurrent sentences where the two counts of child molestation were identical and involved the same child and citing Walker
- noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense
- noting the significance of a defendant’s criminal history varies based upon the gravity, nature, and number of prior offenses in relation to the current offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michael Chambers v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-07-02· cited 142×
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-29· cited 78×
- Michael Miller v. Dushan ZateckySeventh Circuit· 2016-04-26· cited 50×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-10· cited 45×
- Sanchez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-12-22· cited 35×
- Dennis Johnson, Raymond Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-25· cited 25×
- William Remy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-09-30· cited 21×
- Laster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-12-22· cited 18×
- Samuel L. Hobbs, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 17×
- Mitchell Swallows v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-30· cited 15×
- Jeremy Ellis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-21· cited 13×
- Heinzman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27· cited 12×
- Horton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-28· cited 11×
- Jeremiah Edward Erickson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-03-29· cited 11×
- Light v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-19· cited 6×
- Jaco v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-31· cited 2×
- Cory Heinzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27
- John Ludack v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-04-25
- Marshall Barnes-Bey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-03-06
- Terry Twitty, Sr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-27
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 1,831×
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 272×
- Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-11-28· cited 196×
- Buchanan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 165×
- Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 145×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-30· cited 110×
- Francis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 74×
- Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 71×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-15· cited 58×
- Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 56×
- Ruiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-12-07· cited 50×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 41×
- Lander v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-02-15· cited 40×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-02-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.