Second Circuit· 2/6/1989
Ortiz v. Cornetta
Citations
- 867 F.2d 146
- 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 207
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[o]nce a pro se litigant has done everything possible to bring his action, he should not be penalized by strict rules which might otherwise apply if he were represented by counsel”
- “Once a pro se litigant has done everything possible to bring his action, he should not be penalized by strict rules which might otherwise apply if he were represented by counsel”
- “Once a pro se litigant has done everything possible to bring his action, he should not be penalized by strict rules which might otherwise apply if he were represented by counsel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Galimore v. City University of New York Bronx Community CollegeS.D. New York· 2009-07-02· cited 30×
- Massie v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtS.D. New York· 2009-08-28· cited 24×
- Clement v. United Homes, LLCE.D. New York· 2012-12-27· cited 21×
- Old Republic Insurance v. Hansa World Cargo Service, Inc.S.D. New York· 1999-06-01· cited 20×
- Gittens v. Garlocks Sealing TechnologiesW.D. New York· 1998-10-02· cited 16×
- Morris v. People's Republic of ChinaS.D. New York· 2007-03-21· cited 14×
- United States v. $175,918.00 in United States CurrencyS.D. New York· 1991-02-04· cited 14×
- Smith v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2013-12-16· cited 11×
- Levy v. LernerE.D. New York· 1994-05-26· cited 10×
- Wojik v. Postmaster GeneralS.D. New York· 1993-01-19· cited 10×
- Webster v. PotterS.D. New York· 2010-10-27· cited 10×
- Discover Group, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.E.D. New York· 2004-09-02· cited 10×
- Friedman v. Wheat First Securities Inc.S.D. New York· 1999-09-14· cited 6×
- Respass v. New York City Police DepartmentE.D. New York· 1994-05-19· cited 5×
- Harris v. American Protective Services of New York, Inc.W.D. New York· 1998-03-27· cited 5×
- Parks v. Office of Temporary & Disability AssistanceS.D. New York· 2009-12-23· cited 2×
- D'JAMOOS v. GriffithE.D. New York· 2005-05-09· cited 2×
- United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Thirty-One Dollars ($7, 531)E.D. New York· 1989-07-13· cited 2×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economic International Ltd.S.D. New York· 2000-02-16· cited 1×
- Adams v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterS.D. New York· 1996-03-25· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court· 1972-03-20· cited 2,756×
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenSecond Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 425×
- Judy C. EGELSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT GENESEO Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1976-06-07· cited 184×
- Williams v. WardSecond Circuit· 1977-05-26· cited 126×
- Jamil Abdul-Alim Amin v. Universal Life Insurance Company of Memphis, TennesseeFifth Circuit· 1983-06-06· cited 83×
- Ortiz v. CornettaSecond Circuit· 1989-02-06· cited 52×
- Tommie L. Toliver v. County of Sullivan, Richard L. Green, Lloyd T. Shimer, Leon Siegel, Brian IngberSecond Circuit· 1988-03-07· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.