United States v. $175,918.00 in United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ALJ did not err in relying on “outdated” state agency physicians’ opinions despite the availability of additional evidence developed after they issued those opinions where ALJ’s decision reflected “that the ALJ appropriately considered all of the medical evidence of record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).