· 10/2/1998
Gittens v. Garlocks Sealing Technologies
Citations
- 19 F. Supp. 2d 104
- 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 323
- 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1309
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15855
- 1998 WL 702273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \proceeding pro se does not otherwise relieve a litigant from the usual requirements of summary judgment\
- granting summary judgment and finding that plaintiff has “failed to plead that he has a disability within the meaning of the ADA” where “plaintiff has not been limited from employment in general, and in fact has remained employed by defendant”
- although a court should grant “significant liberality in how pro se pleadings are construed ... proceeding pro se does not otherwise relieve a litigant from the usual requirements of summary judgment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.