Skip to main content
· 5/19/1994

Respass v. New York City Police Department

Citations

  • 852 F. Supp. 173
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6869
  • 1994 WL 223049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying proposed amendment to complaint because of plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies
  • finding it “highly unlikely that the mere averment that the warden failed to look behind the facial validity of [the] plaintiff’s commitment order would state a claim against the Department of Corrections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.