Maldonado v. Burge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, at minimum, Petitioner would need to show “a reasonable probability that the suppression motion would succeed, and quite possibly that the suppression 18 motion would in fact succeed”
• “the Supreme Court [in Kimmelman] did not mean to imply that ‘meritorious’ suppression motion is one that is merely colorable, or that the prejudice prong of Strickland is satisfied whenever a party raises a colorable suppression claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).