N.D. California· 3/23/2015
Opperman v. Path, Inc.
Citations
- 84 F. Supp. 3d 962
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36137
- 2015 WL 1306494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because Plaintiffs have failed to plead that they saw, heard, or relied on such [specific] misrepresentations, Plaintiffs’ partial-representation theory fails.”
- “A partial- 23 representation claim requires Plaintiffs to plead reliance on at least some misleading partial 24 representations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tigar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.N.D. California· 2018-03-15· cited 51×
- Beck v. FCA US LLCE.D. Michigan· 2017-08-11· cited 39×
- Yastrab v. Apple Inc.N.D. California· 2016-03-25· cited 12×
- In re Facebook Privacy LitigationN.D. California· 2016-06-28· cited 6×
- La Park La Brea A LLC v. Airbnb, Inc.C.D. California· 2017-12-29· cited 4×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Navarro v. BlockNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestNinth Circuit· 1995-09-20· cited 1,321×
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-02-12· cited 1,065×
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2009-01-12· cited 891×
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 705×
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-16· cited 525×
- Semegen v. WeidnerNinth Circuit· 1985-09-24· cited 476×
- Wolfe v. StrankmanNinth Circuit· 2004-12-14· cited 439×
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-06· cited 345×
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-28· cited 302×
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComNinth Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 279×
- Tamer Salameh v. Tarsadia HotelNinth Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 186×
- Casey v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-03-28· cited 186×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.