Skip to main content
N.D. California· 3/23/2015

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

Citations

  • 84 F. Supp. 3d 962
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36137
  • 2015 WL 1306494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Plaintiffs have failed to plead that they saw, heard, or relied on such [specific] misrepresentations, Plaintiffs’ partial-representation theory fails.”
  • “A partial- 23 representation claim requires Plaintiffs to plead reliance on at least some misleading partial 24 representations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tigar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.