In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in light of “the high price exacted by suppressing evidence,” suppression is unwarranted where law enforcement obtains “evidence that is sufficiently independent of the illegal conduct”
• holding that, in light of “the high price exacted by suppressing evidence,” suppression is unwarranted where law enforcement obtains “evidence that is 1 sufficiently independent of the illegal conduct”
• noting one of two purposes of exclusionary rule “is to deter future unlawful police conduct” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing \an officer's hunch or subjective good faith — even if correct in the end — cannot justify an investigatory stop or detention\
• affirming reversal of trial court's denial of motion to suppress evidence seized during stop, where defendant's only similarity to fugitive police sought was that he was \a black male\
• \A random stop based on nothing more than a non-particularized racial description of the person sought is especially subject to abuse.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).