Skip to main content

Olson v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 558 N.W.2d 491
  • 1997 Minn. LEXIS 78
  • 1997 WL 58704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that our role is not to challenge the wisdom of the legislature, but “to give effect to its will as expressed in the unambiguous language of the statute”
  • “Our role, in any case, is not to challenge the wisdom of the legislature’s act from a distance, but rather to give effect to its will as expressed in the ... statute.”
  • statute barring seat belt evidence in “any litigation involving personal injuries or property damage” barred evidence in an action 9 alleging that the seat belt was defective (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discussing need to avoid absurd result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Olson v. Ford Motor Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.