Skip to main content

Olds v. Donnelly

Citations

  • 696 A.2d 633
  • 150 N.J. 424
  • 1997 N.J. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that legal malpractice claims should be exempt from entire controversy doctrine as we “endeavor ... to temper efficiency with individual justice”
  • holding that the trial court properly dismissed the third party complaint because the successor attorney did not owe the predecessor attorney a duty of care
  • holding that alleged malpractice could not be considered a compulsory counterclaim in underlying action giving rise to the claim
  • noting that plaintiff filed his legal-malpractice suit “well within the six-year limitations period prescribed by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1”
  • overruling Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Hallaran & Ciesla, 142 N.J. 280, 662 A.2d 509 (1995), because “[c]andor compels that we acknowledge that the application of the entire controversy doctrine to legal-malpractice claims has not fulfilled our expectations”
  • “Candor compels that we acknowledge that the application of the entire controversy doctrine to legal-malpractice claims has not fulfilled our expectations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Garibaldi, Handler, O'Hern, Pollock, Poritz, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Olds v. Donnelly

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.