LoBiondo v. Schwartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the elements include an agreement between the parties to inflict a wrong against or an injury upon another, and an overt act that results in damage
• finding that courts may infer malice “from a finding that a defendant has neither probable cause nor a reasonable belief in probable cause” (citation omitted)
• noting that the elements include an agreement between the parties to inflict a wrong against or an injury upon another, and an overt act that results in damage
• stating that “[m]alicious prosecution provides a remedy for harm caused by the institution or continuation of a criminal action that is baseless” before stating the elements of the tort without mentioning the continuation rule (citation omitted)
• stating that “[m]alicious prosecution provides a remedy for harm caused by the institution or continuation of a criminal action that is baseless” before stating the elements of the tort without mentioning the continuation rule (citation omitted)
• discussing, with approval, ALI’s Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).