Skip to main content
· 6/12/2000

Mitchell v. Procini

Citations

  • 752 A.2d 349
  • 331 N.J. Super. 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a settlement with one defendant did not prevent allocation of fault in a separate action against another defendant
  • concluding that a settlement with one defendant did not prevent allocation of fault in a separate action against another defendant
  • characterizing substantial prejudice as involving “specific difficulties in mounting a defense ... significantly different from [those] normally encountered”
  • settlement with one defendant did not preclude allocation of fault in an action against another defendant
  • settlement with one defendant did not preclude allocation of fault in an action against another defendant
  • discussing evolution of the doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges King, Carchman and Lintner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.