· 6/12/2000
Mitchell v. Procini
Citations
- 752 A.2d 349
- 331 N.J. Super. 445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a settlement with one defendant did not prevent allocation of fault in a separate action against another defendant
- concluding that a settlement with one defendant did not prevent allocation of fault in a separate action against another defendant
- characterizing substantial prejudice as involving “specific difficulties in mounting a defense ... significantly different from [those] normally encountered”
- settlement with one defendant did not preclude allocation of fault in an action against another defendant
- settlement with one defendant did not preclude allocation of fault in an action against another defendant
- discussing evolution of the doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges King, Carchman and Lintner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.