California Supreme Court· 11/22/1995

Adams v. Paul

Citations

904 P.2d 1205
11 Cal. 4th 583
46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 594
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8913
95 Daily Journal DAR 15457
1995 Cal. LEXIS 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that fact of damage rather than amount is relevant consideration for determining when statute of limitations is triggered for an attorney-malpractice claim
reasoning that fact of damage rather than amount is relevant consideration for determining when statute of limitations is triggered for an attorney-malpractice claim
indicating that a client is injured when an attorney negligently fails to file the client's claim within the statute of limitations
“the fact of damage” and “the amount” are different considerations for statute of limitations purposes
lead opn. of Arabian, 1
lead opn. of Arabian, 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arabian, Kennard, Lucas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.