Supreme Court· 5/16/1927
Ohio Ex Rel. Clarke v. Deckebach
Citations
- 274 U.S. 392
- 47 S. Ct. 630
- 71 L. Ed. 1115
- 1927 U.S. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an Ohio law banning alien ownership of pool halls constitutional as it did not amount to “plainly irrational discrimination”
- holding an Ohio law banning alien ownership of pool halls constitutional as it did not amount to “plainly irrational discrimination”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 2,711×
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 1,848×
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 1,494×
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court· 1950-05-08· cited 933×
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 921×
- Aptheker v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 709×
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 608×
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court· 1942-02-02· cited 508×
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 486×
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 480×
- Sugarman v. DougallSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 451×
- Examining Bd. of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores De OteroSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 441×
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court· 1929-11-25· cited 432×
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court· 1928-04-30· cited 397×
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court· 1934-12-03· cited 390×
- Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 271×
- Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court· 1968-01-15· cited 270×
- Ambach v. NorwickSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 255×
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court· 1935-03-18· cited 241×
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-07-01· cited 227×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court· 1915-11-01· cited 1,066×
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1923-11-12· cited 477×
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1914-01-19· cited 328×
- McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1877-04-30· cited 261×
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1912-06-07· cited 148×
- Asakura v. City of SeattleSupreme Court· 1924-05-26· cited 145×
- Webb v. O'BRIENSupreme Court· 1923-11-19· cited 68×
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court· 1900-04-09· cited 55×
- Porterfield v. Webb, Attorney General of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1923-11-12· cited 55×
- Ho Ah Kow v. NunanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California· 1879-07-07· cited 47×
- Cockrill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1925-05-11· cited 37×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MimsSupreme Court· 1917-01-22· cited 31×
- Allen v. Alleghany Co.Supreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 23×
- Fraser v. McConway & Torley Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania· 1897-08-26· cited 21×
- Lee v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 17×
- Nevada-California-Oregon Railway v. BurrusSupreme Court· 1917-05-21· cited 15×
- Wong Wai v. WilliamsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California· 1900-05-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.