McCready v. Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a state law prohibiting nonresidents from planting oysters in a riverbed owned by the state did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause
• upholding a state statute that prohibited non- state citizens from planting oysters in tidal lands
• upholding a state statute that prohibited non-state citizens from planting oysters in tidal lands
• \There has been . . . no . . . grant of power over the fisheries [to the United States]. These remain under the exclusive control of the State. . .\
• “There has been . . . no . . . grant of power over the fisheries [to the United States]. These remain under the exclusive control of the State . . .”
• restrictions on oyster harvesting permitted under concept of state authority to regulate public waters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).