Murphy v. California
Citations
- 225 U.S. 623
- 32 S. Ct. 697
- 56 L. Ed. 1229
- 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2109
Syllabus
<p>While the Fourteenth Amendment protects the citizen in his right to engage in any lawful business, it does not prevent legislation intended to.regulate useful occupations, which because of their nature and location, may prove injurious or offensive to the public.</p> <p>The Fourteenth Amendment docs not prevent a municipality from prohibitiñg any business which is inherently vicious and harmful.</p> <p>The Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent a State from regulating or prohibiting a non-useful occupation which may become harmful to the public, and the regulation or prohibition need not be postponed until the evil is flagrant.</p> <p>An ordinance prohibiting the keeping of billiard halls is not unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, either as depriving the owner of the hall of his property without duo process of law dr as denying him the equal protection of the laws.</p> <p>Where, in the exercise of the police power, the municipal authorities by ordinance determine that a certain- class of resorts should be prohibited as harmful to the public, the courts cannot except from the operation of the statute one of the class affected on the ground that his particular place does not produce the evil aimed at by the ordinance.</p> <p>One cannot be heard to complain of his money loss by reason of the legislating out of existence of a business in which he had invested and which is not protected by the Federal or state constitution and which he knew was subject to police regulation or prohibition.</p> <p>A classification in a statute regulating billiard halls based on hotels having twenty-five rooms is reasonable; and the Owner of a billiard hall, not connected with a hotel, is not denied equal protection of the laws by an ordinance prohibiting keeping billiard halls for hire because hotels having twenty-five rooms can maintain’a billiard hall for their regular guests.</p> <p>One who does not keep a hotel 'with less than the specified number of rooms, cannot be hea
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that such occupations are “neither protected by the state nor the Federal Constitution”
- evidence that defendant ran an orderly, moral pool hall did not controvert legislative finding that pool halls tend to be immoral and disorderly
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.