E.D. Virginia· 12/7/1995
Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
Citations
- 906 F. Supp. 324
- 37 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1656
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18518
- 1995 WL 728365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that second sentence of 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) is applicable to determine priority of invention in infringement suits as well as in interference proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 3,459×
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 939×
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 449×
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekFederal Circuit· 1993-03-11· cited 284×
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1988-06-15· cited 281×
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 257×
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1969-03-14· cited 64×
- Innovative Scuba Concepts, Inc. v. Feder Industries, Inc., D/B/A Scuba ManufacturingFederal Circuit· 1994-06-15· cited 48×
- In re BassCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-03-15· cited 36×
- In re KatzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1982-08-27· cited 32×
- New Idea Farm Equipment Corporation v. Sperry Corporation and New Holland, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1990-10-12· cited 25×
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1970-04-09· cited 13×
- Potter Instrument Co., Inc. v. ODEC Computer Systems, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1974-01-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.