Skip to main content
· 6/15/1994

Innovative Scuba Concepts, Inc. v. Feder Industries, Inc., D/B/A Scuba Manufacturing

Citations

  • 26 F.3d 1112
  • 31 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1132
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14662
  • 1994 WL 259493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing interference under the FMLA from causes 27 of action for retaliation or discrimination
  • “‘Futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial 27 of . . . leave to amend.’”
  • “De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and 27 recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the 28 findings and recommendations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Michel, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.