Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that “if Congress wants the federal courts to issue injunctions without regard to historic equity principles, it is going to have to say so in explicit and even shameless language”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 245×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-06-05· cited 16×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
• Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 390×
• Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Lubrizol Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1995-09-01· cited 165×
• Norman P. Singer v. Thomas F. Dungan Benjamin Flammey the Cambridge Institute, Incorporated
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 91×
• Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1991-12-26· cited 76×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-06-05· cited 16×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-03-22· cited 13×
• Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-07-02· cited 11×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-07-17· cited 11×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-12-07· cited 3×