Skip to main content
· 4/30/2003

Nienaber v. Marriage of Nienaber

Citations

  • 787 N.E.2d 450
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 744
  • 2003 WL 1986654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we had previously rejected the argument that the court must specifically identify which of the statutory factors had substantially changed
  • refusing to elevate form over substance with respect to the use of the term \circumstance\ rather than \factor\ for purposes of custody modification
  • discussing custody modification under I.C. §§ 31-17-2-21 and 31-17-2-8 in a dissolution proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedlander, Brook, Mattingly-May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.