Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that statutory interpretation begins with the statutory language itself and the words of the statute need to be understood in their ordinary meanings
• considering the legislative history of § 5-108 to hold that the statute was applicable to a cause of action concerning an injury that arose from a latent defect in the construction of a swimming pool
• using similar reasoning and reaching same conclusion as to similar exclusion
• reaching same conclusion on similar reasoning in interpreting similar statutory language
• “[A] statute must be construed as a whole so that no word, clause, sentence or phrase is rendered surplusage, superfluous, meaningless or nugatory.”
• both of which rely on a similar definition of \improvement\ as defined in Black's Law Dictionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).