Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 120 Nev. 944
  • 102 P.3d 569
  • 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 96
  • 2004 Nev. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing similar language in the trespass-burglary context and holding that the offenses are mutually exclusive
  • analyzing similar language in the trespass-burglary context and holding that the offenses are mutually exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Rose, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.