Nowell v. Central Service Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘Plan’ means a single plan ..., as opposed to a number of plans, if, on an ongoing basis, all of the plan assets are available to pay benefits to employees who are covered by the plan and their beneficiaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Navlet v. Port of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-10-16· cited 21×
• Boos v. AT&T, INC.
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-06-03· cited 15×
• Sara Lee Corp. v. American Bakers Ass'n Retirement Plan
  District of Columbia· 2009-12-01· cited 2×
• Sara Lee Corporation v. American Bakers Association Retirement Plan
  District of Columbia· 2009-12-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mead Corp. v. Tilley
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 156×
• Donovan v. Dillingham
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-10-15· cited 144×
• Mdphysicians & Associates, Inc. v. State Board of Insurance, a Body Politic of the State of Texas
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-04-01· cited 117×
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Artra Group, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-08-11· cited 9×
• Hall v. Maine Municipal Employees Health Trust
  D. Maine· 2000-03-15· cited 9×