Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 6/3/2011

Boos v. AT&T, INC.

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 127
  • 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2210
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11352
  • 2011 WL 2163611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding retirees who received reimbursements had not foregone any income to receive payments after retirement
  • “Whether a benefit plan is a single plan or multiple plans is determined by employer intent.”
  • “Although intent is often a question of fact, here, where the underlying facts are undisputed, the question is one of law.”
  • court will grant summary judgment for movant if no reasonable juror could find for non-movant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Stewart, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Boos v. AT&T, INC.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.