Skip to main content

Novotney v. Burger King Corp.

Citations

  • 499 N.W.2d 379
  • 198 Mich. App. 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a condition is considered “open and obvious” if the dangerous characteristics are “readily apparent or easily discoverable upon casual inspection by the average user of ordinary intelligence.”
  • discussing the open and obvious nature of a sidewalk with a handicap access ramp
  • discussing the open and obvious nature of a sidewalk with a handicap access ramp
  • “[T]here is no duty to warn of open and obvious dangers . . . .”
  • “[A]n obvious danger is no danger to a reasonably careful person . . . . Its nature, as well as any danger presented, is apparent upon casual inspection by an average user with ordinary intelligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawyer, Kelly, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Novotney v. Burger King Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.