White v. Badalamenti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To be an invitee, plaintiff’s presence on defendants’ land must have been related to an activity of some tangible benefit to defendants”
• plaintiff on defendants’ property to pick up her daughter, whom defendants were babysitting pursuant to “a mutually beneficial, albeit informal, exchange of services”
• the issue of the visitor’s status as an invitee or licensee is a question of fact if there is a factual dispute regarding the purpose for which the visitor is on the premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2000-09-19· cited 282×
• Altairi v. Alhaj
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-08-30· cited 17×
• Haas v. City of Ionia
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-11-21· cited 13×
• D'AMBROSIO v. McCready
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-11-06· cited 4×
• Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-08-19· cited 4×
• Ryder Truck Rental, Inc v. Urbane
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-06-17· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-23· cited 327×
• Novotney v. Burger King Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-01· cited 143×
• Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1987-11-13· cited 118×
• Preston v. Sleziak
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1970-04-13· cited 79×
• Paterek v. 6600 Ltd.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-12-05· cited 39×
• Leveque v. Leveque
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-05-26· cited 14×
• Forche v. Gieseler
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-06· cited 12×
• Wert v. Afton
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 3×