Eason v. Coggins Memorial Christian Methodist Episcopal Church

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]ere conclusions, unsupported by allegations of fact, will not suffice to state a cause of action.”
• “[M]ere conclusions, unsupported by allegations of fact, will not suffice to state a cause of action.”
• “[M]ere conclusions, unsupported by allegations of fact, will not suffice to state a cause of action.”
• although the plaintiff went beyond the four corners of the complaint to explain her specific theory of latent defect in the ladder at the motion hearing, her comments merely showed that further factual development may establish a theory of recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).