Hughes v. Pmg Building, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because only four men worked on an overhang, it did not pose a risk to a significant number of workers
• holding that a porch overhang atop which four roofers worked, all of whom were employees of the same roofing subcontractor, did not constitute a common work area
• finding that four workers is not a significant number for purposes of the third element
• “Whether a danger is open and obvious depends upon whether it is reasonable to expect an average person of ordinary intelligence to discover the danger upon casual inspection.”
• where the stability of the support for an overhang was obscured from sight
• where the stability of the support for an overhang was obscured from sight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).