Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/20/2013

Evans v. Michigan

Citations

  • 133 S. Ct. 1069
  • 185 L. Ed. 2d 124
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 1614
  • 568 U.S. 313
  • 81 U.S.L.W. 4103

About this case

Evans v. Michigan

Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if a person accused of a crime receives a directed acquittal , the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second trial of that person for the same crime, even if the person was acquitted in error.[1] [2] [3]

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evans_v._Michigan&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: References")

  1. ↑ Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313 (2013).
  2. ↑ Ronald J. Allen et al., Criminal Procedure: Adjudication and Right to Counsel 1550-53 (3d ed. 2016).
  3. ↑ Vladeck, Steve (February 25, 2013). "Opinion recap: Reaffirming double jeopardy's line between "substantive" and "procedural" dismissals" . SCOTUSblog. Retrieved September 18, 2025.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evans_v._Michigan&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: External links")

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evans_v._Michigan&oldid=1351329206 "

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Evans v. Michigan

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.