Skip to main content

Norrie v. Heil Co.

Citations

  • 203 Conn. 594
  • 525 A.2d 1332
  • 1987 Conn. LEXIS 852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court did not include contributory negligence as a special defense in its jury charge, and therefore did not err
  • assessing alleged jury confusion by examining logical consistency between answers to several interrogatories
  • \[m]isuse occurs when a product is not used in a manner which should have been foreseen by the defendant\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.