Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/26/1987
Norrie v. Heil Co.
Citations
- 203 Conn. 594
- 525 A.2d 1332
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 852
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court did not include contributory negligence as a special defense in its jury charge, and therefore did not err
- assessing alleged jury confusion by examining logical consistency between answers to several interrogatories
- \[m]isuse occurs when a product is not used in a manner which should have been foreseen by the defendant\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hull
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-11· cited 355×
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-03· cited 171×
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 108×
- Shegog v. ZabreckyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-02-07· cited 50×
- Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-31· cited 47×
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-11-20· cited 42×
- Chapman v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-12· cited 36×
- Nicholson v. United Technologies Corp.D. Connecticut· 1988-10-11· cited 29×
- Gemme v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-01· cited 26×
- Gajewski v. PaveloConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-12-22· cited 24×
- Earlington v. AnastasiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-25· cited 14×
- Treglia v. ZaneskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-12-25· cited 14×
- Bilodeau v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-07-18· cited 13×
- Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-03-23· cited 11×
- Grimes v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-24· cited 10×
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-09· cited 8×
- Fisk v. ReddingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-11-09· cited 4×
- Simmons v. Lincoln Electric Company, 86-4840 (1995)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 1995-06-23
- Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-08-13
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 759×
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-15· cited 178×
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-28· cited 136×
- Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-09· cited 62×
- Herb v. KerrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-17· cited 54×
- Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-03-24· cited 48×
- Hoelter v. Mohawk Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-06· cited 42×
- Kalleher v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-02-10· cited 42×
- Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-03-20· cited 36×
- Murteza v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-04-29· cited 23×
- Nally v. CharbonneauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-07-01· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.