Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where “a manufac turer or seller failed to warn of [a] product’s unreasonably dangerous propensities ... the failure to warn, by itself, constitutes a defect”
• stating that amendments \`relate back to the date of the complaint unless they alleged a new cause of action.'\
• stating that amendments \`relate back to the date of the complaint unless they allege a new cause of action\'
• stating that amendments \`relate back to the date of the complaint unless they allege a new cause of action.'\
• noting that to prevail on a products liability claim plaintiff must prove that “the defect caused the injury for which compensation was sought”
• suggesting that abuse of discretion standard applies to relation back inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).