Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/22/1994
Gajewski v. Pavelo
Citations
- 36 Conn. App. 601
- 652 A.2d 509
- 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that current statutory scheme intended to merge various common-law theories of product liability into one cause of action
- “[I]n practical terms, there is no difference between the statutory strict liability of § 52-572q and negligence with respect to the law of warnings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 67×
- Glucksman v. WaltersConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-06-06· cited 34×
- Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-06· cited 30×
- Cotto v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-15· cited 21×
- Moss v. Wyeth Inc.D. Connecticut· 2012-05-24· cited 21×
- Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.D. Connecticut· 2000-10-24· cited 14×
- Barrese v. DeFillippoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-06· cited 14×
- Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.Second Circuit· 2002-07-19· cited 10×
- Durrant v. BOARD OF ED. OF CITY OF HARTFORDConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-11· cited 7×
- Glover v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-07· cited 6×
- Michele M. Vitanza, Individually and as of the Estate of Timothy F. Vitanza v. The Upjohn CompanySecond Circuit· 2000-05-05· cited 5×
- Murphy v. WakeleeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-08-26· cited 5×
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.D. Connecticut· 1999-03-31· cited 4×
- Densberger v. United Technologies CorporationSecond Circuit· 2002-07-19· cited 1×
- Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.Second Circuit· 2002-03-12· cited 1×
- Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-16· cited 1×
- Densberger v. United Technologies CorporationSecond Circuit· 2002-03-12
- Kissel v. Center for Women's Health, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-06-29
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beale v. HardyFourth Circuit· 1985-08-07· cited 1,011×
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-06-20· cited 367×
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 259×
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-08· cited 258×
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-10· cited 198×
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 171×
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-31· cited 168×
- Markey v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-01-22· cited 148×
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 139×
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-28· cited 136×
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-03· cited 81×
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-07-06· cited 70×
- Rodia v. Tesco Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-30· cited 51×
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-05· cited 48×
- Mei v. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-04-08· cited 45×
- Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-01· cited 40×
- Norrie v. Heil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-26· cited 37×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-01-27· cited 27×
- Frigon v. Enfield Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-01-22· cited 24×
- Bell v. BiharySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-04-01· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.