Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/31/1994
Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 229 Conn. 500
- 642 A.2d 709
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[s]ubstantiai differences between the product liability act and its vetoed predecessor provide additional evidence that the legislature’s omission of ‘claimant’ from General Statutes § 52-572p was intentional”
- \[w]e will not interpret a statute to have the effect of altering prior statutory or common law unless the language of the statute clearly expresses an intent to have such an effect\
- ‘‘[w]e will not interpret a statute to have the effect of altering prior statutory or common law unless the language of the statute clearly expresses an intent to have such an effect’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court· 1996-01-29· cited 196×
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-27· cited 126×
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 67×
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-05· cited 48×
- Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 47×
- Matyas v. MinckConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-21· cited 42×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-30· cited 36×
- Whitehead v. Toyota Motor Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-05-01· cited 33×
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-12· cited 28×
- Ciarelli v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-08· cited 27×
- State v. ManiniConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-06-06· cited 24×
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-03· cited 16×
- Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-14· cited 16×
- State v. O'neilConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-21· cited 16×
- Doe v. Bridgeport Police DepartmentD. Connecticut· 2001-01-18· cited 16×
- 37 Huntington Street v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-03· cited 14×
- Truglio v. Hayes Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-06· cited 12×
- Carpenter v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-25· cited 9×
- Leydon v. Town of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-16· cited 7×
- Svege v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.D. Connecticut· 2004-07-22· cited 3×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 154×
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-03-17· cited 153×
- Malerba v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-21· cited 150×
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 139×
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-02-28· cited 117×
- Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-11-06· cited 107×
- Prokolkin v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-02· cited 90×
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-01-12· cited 84×
- City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-05-20· cited 74×
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-21· cited 51×
- Airkaman, Inc. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-28· cited 46×
- Hoelter v. Mohawk Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-06· cited 42×
- Norrie v. Heil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-26· cited 37×
- Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-03-23· cited 11×
- Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 1×
Other cases named Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.