Seventh Circuit· 8/3/1994
Norman J. Johnson v. Clarence Trigg
Citations
- 28 F.3d 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding interrogation of 14-year-old while mother was also being held in custody did not violate the Due Process Clause
- finding inter- rogation of 14-year-old while mother was also being held in custody did not violate the Due Process Clause
- confession voluntary even though 14-year-old defendant of below average intelligence saw police arrest terminally ill mother before confessing
- bona fide arrest inducing confession, unless used as a pretext to extract the confession, does not justify suppression
- “Custodial interrogation is permitted [and] courts allow interrogators in these already coercive custodial settings considerable latitude in playing on the guilt and fears of the person interrogated in order to extract a confession that he will shortly regret having given.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Cummings, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. ManningIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-04-16· cited 196×
- Derrick Hardaway v. Donald S. Young, WardenSeventh Circuit· 2002-09-11· cited 188×
- Frank Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2002-05-17· cited 179×
- State v. BlankSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-04-11· cited 154×
- United States v. KizeartSeventh Circuit· 2007-10-10· cited 149×
- United States v. Taryll MillerSeventh Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 140×
- Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09· cited 123×
- United States v. CeballosSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 120×
- Lourenzy Stone, A/K/A Lorenzo L. Stone-Bey v. Robert A. Farley and Pamela Carter, Indiana Attorney GeneralSeventh Circuit· 1996-06-14· cited 112×
- Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory AncelSeventh Circuit· 1995-06-30· cited 101×
- United States v. Kenneth P. Kontny and Joann L. KontnySeventh Circuit· 2001-01-04· cited 82×
- Alejandro Ruvalcaba v. Nedra Chandler, WardenSeventh Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 53×
- United States v. Barry Keeter, Darres Park, and Paul D. AhrensSeventh Circuit· 1997-11-24· cited 45×
- United States v. Charles BaldwinSeventh Circuit· 1995-07-19· cited 42×
- United States v. Damien HillSeventh Circuit· 1999-11-12· cited 37×
- Nathan D. Alexander, Ii, and Amy Gepfert v. Joseph DeangeloSeventh Circuit· 2003-05-22· cited 35×
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-09-30· cited 34×
- United States v. D.F.Seventh Circuit· 1995-11-17· cited 33×
- Larry Watson v. George E. DetellaSeventh Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 31×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 3,502×
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 2,073×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 1,164×
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 1,094×
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,069×
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1963-03-25· cited 792×
- Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 716×
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 319×
- Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Seventh Circuit· 1989-07-20· cited 313×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-19· cited 175×
- United States v. Roger RutledgeSeventh Circuit· 1990-04-26· cited 151×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.