Skip to main content
· 6/30/1995

Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory Ancel

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 1215
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16156
  • 1995 WL 392051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing under Illinois law that a corporate fiduciary owes a duty of loyalty to the corporation
  • noting that \minority shareholders owe a duty of loyalty to a close corporation in certain circumstances\
  • “Minority shareholders have an obligation as de facto partners in a joint venture not to do damage to the corporate interests”
  • when challenged, the amount in controversy must be supported by “competent proof,” which is “proof to a reasonable probability that jurisdiction exists.”
  • \Minority shareholders have an obligation as de facto partners in a joint venture not to do damage to the corporate interests\
  • “Where, as here, a defendant chal lenges the plaintiffs allegation of the amount in controversy, the plaintiff must support its assertion with ‘competent proof.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.