Nolen v. Gober

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the determination whether the duty to assist was complied with will involve making factual determinations
• assigning error as to duty-to-assist violation and as to failure to apply 38 U.S.C. § 1154(b) properly
• Board’s determination whether Secretary has fulfilled his duty to assist reviewed under “clearly erroneous” standard
• “The Board’s determination of whether the Secretary has fulfilled his duty to assist generally is a finding of fact....”
• Board determination as to whether the Secretary fulfilled his duty to assist is a finding of fact subject to review under the \clearly erroneous\ standard prescribed by 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(4)
• Board determination as to whether the Secretary fulfilled his duty to assist is a finding of fact subject to review under the “clearly erroneous” standard prescribed by 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).