Tyra K. Mitchell v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pain alone does not constitute function loss, but is just one fact to be considered when evaluating functional impairment
• holding that pain alone does not constitute function loss but is just one fact to be considered when evaluating functional impairment
• holding that pain alone does not constitute a functional loss under VA regulations that evaluate disability based on limitation of range of motion
• holding that pain alone does not constitute a functional loss under VA regulations which evaluate disabilities based upon limitation of motion
• holding that pain alone does not constitute a functional loss under VA regulations that evaluate disability based on limitation of range of motion
• holding that in rating limitation of motion outside of the context of Diagnostic Code 5003, painful motion alone may not be deemed limitation of motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).