Veterans Claims· 6/7/2001

Mahl v. Principi

Citations

15 Vet. App. 37
2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 800
2001 WL 640170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, when remand is appropriate, the Court need not “analyze and discuss all the other claimed errors that would result in a remedy no broader than a remand”
holding that where remand is appropriate, the Court need not “analyze and discuss all the other claimed errors that would result in a remedy no broader than a remand”
holding that where remand is appropriate, the Court need not \analyze and discuss all the other claimed errors that would result in a remedy no broader than a remand\
describing Court's discretion, in VCAA-remand context, not to address nonreversal grounds
Court will rarely address issues unnecessary to its decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mahl v. Principi

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.