Veterans Claims· 7/5/2016

Correia v. McDonald

Citations

28 Vet. App. 158
2016 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1015
2016 WL 3591858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that § 4.59 requires that the listed range of motion testing be conducted to the extent practicable in all cases involving joint disabilities
holding that additional requirements must be met prior to finding that a VA examination is adequate
holding that 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 is ambiguous because its language is susceptible to more than one meaning
holding that the final sentence of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2015) requires that VA examinations include joint testing for pain on both active and passive motion, in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing and, if possible, with range of motion measurements of the opposite undamaged joint
examining the placement of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 within the regulatory scheme to determine its meaning
examining the placement of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 within the regulatory scheme to determine its meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagel, Pietsch, Schoelen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.