Schaumberg v. Schaumberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because husband used a marital loan to “maintain and augment” a business asset, that “changed [the asset’s] character from a personal asset to a marital asset”
• concluding that use of marital assets to increase the value of nonmarital property changed the character of the appreciated portion from a separate asset to a marital asset, of which each spouse was entitled to half
• stating the \trial court ... was in a superior position to judge the credibility of the witnesses and to weigh the evidence\
• presuming trial court’s findings correct where husband “merely reargued the evidence supporting his position.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).