Noble v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts have inherent power to protect and defend their decrees by way of contempt proceedings
• reversing a district court's child support decision because it failed to make supporting findings and the record was unclear to imply such, and remanding for it to make sufficient findings
• the district court enjoys discretion in determining what constitutes the child’s best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spears v. Spears
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-06-14· cited 34×
• Culbertson v. Culbertson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-04-09· cited 26×
• Primm v. Lopes
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 18×
• South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of Nevada
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-26· cited 15×
• Guerin v. Guerin
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 12×
• Luciano v. Diercks
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 7×
• Westgate v. Westgate
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 6×
• Awad v. Wright
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 6×
• Nichols v. Nichols
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-07-23· cited 5×
• Conrad v. Conrad
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-04-17· cited 5×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 5×
• Howe v. Howe
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1971-12-08· cited 4×
• All Minerals Corp. v. Kunkle
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 3×
• Prins v. Prins
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-05-01· cited 1×
• Reid v. Reid
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1973-10-23· cited 1×
• Brown v. Brown
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 1×
• Lawry v. Lawry
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-05-14
• Wallaker v. Wallaker
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1982-01-28
• Bellisario v. Bellisario (Child Custody)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-09-16