District of Columbia· 6/12/2009
Ning Ye v. Holder
Citations
- 624 F. Supp. 2d 121
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49151
- 2009 WL 1649997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiff had not exhausted administrative remedies where he “does not specify where or to whom he submitted [his FOIA] request” and where declaration establishes that agency “had never received the request”
- dismissing claim when the plaintiff offered a letter from FedEx stating that a “M. Parris” signed for a certain parcel because the letter failed to “identify the shipper, the addressee, the parcel, or the relationship between ‘M. Parris’ and the unknown addressee”
- “Should petitioner wish to obtain information from the DOJ, he could (re)submit [his requests], ensure 6 receipt, and properly begin the process (anew).”
- plaintiff’s attestation that he mailed FOIA request and submission of tracking information that did not show the recipient’s name or address failed to overcome agency declaration that it had no record of receiving plaintiff’s request
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-24· cited 23×
- Toensing v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-13· cited 19×
- Tunchez v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-03· cited 7×
- Clemente v. Federal Bureau of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2010-09-28
- Tunchez v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-03
- Talbot v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-07
- Ballow v. United States Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2021-01-05
- Gage v. United States Attorney GeneralDistrict of Columbia· 2022-02-28
- Mann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-24
- Patterson v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-08
- Patterson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2023-01-20
- Geddis v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2024-02-16
- Haleem v. Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2024-12-18
- Gu v. TrumpDistrict of Columbia· 2025-12-19
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,484×
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 1,473×
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 892×
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 464×
- Wilbur v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 400×
- Richard Drake v. Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2002-07-22· cited 381×
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court· 1988-12-06· cited 355×
- Swan v. ClintonD.C. Circuit· 1996-11-22· cited 212×
- Power, David F. v. Massanari, Larry G.D.C. Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 172×
- In Re Medicare Reimbursement LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2005-07-01· cited 141×
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 133×
- 13th Regional Corporation and Al-Ind-Esk-A, Inc. v. U.S. Department of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1980-11-20· cited 93×
- Doe, John v. Exxon Mobil CorpD.C. Circuit· 2007-01-12· cited 65×
- West v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia· 2006-09-15· cited 44×
- Banks v. LappinDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-22· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.