In Re Medicare Reimbursement Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mandamus is cognizable only where “the plaintiff has a clear right to relief”
• holding that mandamus is cognizable only where “the plaintiff has a clear right to relief”
• stating that “a court may grant relief only when it finds compelling . . . equitable grounds”
• finding that futility was demonstrated where, inter alia, the reopening period had expired and CMS had issued a ruling “barr[ing] intermediaries from reopening closed NPRs to recalculate DSH entitlement”
• finding that futility was demonstrated where, inter alia, the reopening period had expired and CMS had issued a ruling \barr[ing] intermediaries from reopening closed NPRs to recalculate DSH entitlement\
• finding that futility was demonstrated where, inter alia, the reopening period had expired and CMS had issued a ruling \barr[ing] intermediaries from reopening closed NPRs to recalculate DSH entitlement\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).