Ning Ye v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff had not exhausted administrative remedies where he “does not specify where or to whom he submitted [his FOIA] request” and where declaration establishes that agency “had never received the request”
• dismissing claim when the plaintiff offered a letter from FedEx stating that a “M. Parris” signed for a certain parcel because the letter failed to “identify the shipper, the addressee, the parcel, or the relationship between ‘M. Parris’ and the unknown addressee”
• “Should petitioner wish to obtain information from the DOJ, he could (re)submit [his requests], ensure 6 receipt, and properly begin the process (anew).”
• plaintiff’s attestation that he mailed FOIA request and submission of tracking information that did not show the recipient’s name or address failed to overcome agency declaration that it had no record of receiving plaintiff’s request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).