Skip to main content

Niehaus v. State

Citations

  • 359 N.E.2d 513
  • 265 Ind. 655
  • 1977 Ind. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The method of identification utilized here ... is simply a matter of comparison of items of physical evidence to determine if they are reciprocal”
  • “Bite mark comparison evidence is currently admissible in at least thirty-five states.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice, Debruler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Niehaus v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.