Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 766 N.E.2d 377
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 330
  • 2002 WL 652110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that embracing the rationale of Kumho Tire would require “replacing] the language of our Evidence Rule 702 with the different language of its federal counterpart”
  • describing bite mark identification as “ ‘simply a matter of comparison of items of physical evidence to determine if they are reciprocal’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.