Skip to main content

Brooks v. State

Citations

  • 748 So. 2d 736
  • 1999 WL 798599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We now take the opportunity to state affirmatively that bite-mark identification evidence is admissible in Mississippi.\
  • expert testimony admissible, yet \there are no established guidelines in evaluating bite-mark evidence\
  • expert testimony admissible, yet “there are no established guidelines in evaluating bite-mark evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banks, McRae, Pittman, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.