Nicky Charune Agnew v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whenever possible, we reject form-over-substance requirements that favor procedural machinations over reaching the merits of a case.”
• “Whenever possible, we reject form-over-substance requirements that favor procedural machinations over reaching the merits of a case.”
• “Counter-points assist the appellate court in finding the answers given to the points of the appellant. From the standpoint of the advocate, their function is to show that the point or points of the opposite party are not valid.”
• in opposition to summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).